2025-06-25 04:30:48
If such things did exist they would currently be swamped by people discussing global news:
Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites
2025-06-25 00:27:26
Who would have guessed?
Will Oremus: “Separately and notably, GLAAD — which dropped its opposition to KOSA last year after changes to the bill, easing its path to Democratic support — told me it now wants lawmakers to review the bill in light of “changes in the FTC and other government leadership”
2025-06-24 19:49:55
I can’t say that I am entirely surprised, and it’s a bit more proportionate than “Backdooring Signal” however it really should have judicial oversight.
Police to gain powers to grab online data when they seize phones and laptops | Computer Weekly
2025-06-20 15:54:09
The state has a monopoly on violence.
The state has a monopoly on censorship.
The state tries to have a monopoly on surveillance.
If the state deploys infrastructural internet services with logging and content filtering, those things are surveillance and censorship because [they are] “done by the state”.
In reference to:
2025-06-20 14:39:24
While we’re on the general topic of if you adequately lie to a computer you will always get what you want:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14020
2025-06-20 13:36:16
Of course it’s an inevitability even for the Blogosphere but I was amused to find this thing in my spam inbox this morning; none of the links check-out and apparently inboxgate.rest has a reputation for spam.
It smells very much like LinkedIn engagement spam.
