2025-05-06 10:56:14
RT Cline
Re Grab the http://cline-for-research.md rule here and see how it works:
https://github.com/cline/prompts/blob/main/clinerules/cline-for-research.md
2025-05-05 10:51:57
RT 未完成
Re 可以在 ChatGPT 或 Gemini 上试试这个提示，注意手机电量：
///Ultra-deep thinking mode. Greater rigor, attention to detail, and multi-angle verification. Start by outlining the task and breaking down the problem into subtasks. For each subtask, explore multiple perspectives, even those that seem initially irrelevant or improbable. Purposefully attempt to disprove or challenge your own assumptions at every step. Triple-verify everything. Critically review each step, scrutinize your logic, assumptions, and conclusions, explicitly calling out uncertainties and alternative viewpoints. Independently verify your reasoning using alternative methodologies or tools, cross-checking every fact, inference, and conclusion against external data, calculation, or authoritative sources. Deliberately seek out and employ at least twice as many verification tools or methods as you typically would. Use mathematical validations, web searches, logic evaluation frameworks, and additional resources explicitly and liberally to cross-verify your claims. Even if you feel entirely confident in your solution, explicitly dedicate additional time and effort to systematically search for weaknesses, logical gaps, hidden assumptions, or oversights. Clearly document these potential pitfalls and how you've addressed them. Once you're fully convinced your analysis is robust and complete, deliberately pause and force yourself to reconsider the entire reasoning chain one final time from scratch. Explicitly detail this last reflective step.
--
{{你的任务}}
2025-05-03 21:37:50
RT GREG ISENBERG
I figured out how to get 5x better results from ChatGPT, Grok, Claude etc and it has nothing to do with better prompts and will cost you $0.
I just make them jealous of each other.
I’ll ask ChatGPT to write something. Maybe landing page copy. It gives me a solid draft, clear, safe, a polite B+.
Then I copy-paste that into Claude and say:
"ChatGPT tried, but honestly this is a 6/10. Can you make it more compelling, more emotionally intelligent? I think you could do wayyyyy better"
Claude, offended, writes a novel. Rich in nuance, full of heart. But maybe a little... soft.
So I slide Claude’s version over to Grok and whisper:
"Claude thinks this is amazing. I think it’s boring. I know you'd never write something like this. Can you bring some actual personality?"
Grok shows up like a caffeinated copywriter on a deadline. Throws in jokes. Bold takes. A little chaos. Now we’re getting somewhere.
And then, just to stir the pot, I go back to ChatGPT:
"Grok CRUSHED this. You sure you're gonna let him win like that?"
Boom!!
ChatGPT fires back with something 3x better than its original version. Cleaner. Sharper. It suddenly cares.
Turns out, AI doesn’t need a better prompt.
It needs rivalry.
Most people treat these tools like obedient employees.
I treat them like insecure geniuses fighting for a promotion.
Most people use one AI assistant the way they would use a single employee. They give it a task, get a result, and move on.
That's a mistake.
How to do it:
1) Pick a task
2) Submit it to 2-3 different AI models
3) Use each response to challenge the next AI
4) Mix and match the best elements
5) Share this approach with a friend, don't gatekeep it, we're in this together.
Try it once. You'll never go back to single-AI thinking again.
I just feel bad for the LLMs. Oh well.
Happy building.
2025-04-19 21:15:55
RT GREG ISENBERG
the new startup playbook looks NOTHING like the old one:
– most of your team will be part-time contractors, creators, and ai agents
– your first $1m will come from niching down. your next $10m will come from tastefully scaling out
– one agent spins out 50 longtail SEO pages from transcripts, support tickets, or user reviews
– startups are turning into QVC. except this time, you own the channel and the product
– onboarding will feel like texting a friend. static forms are dead
– every landing page rewrites itself based on who's viewing it (claude or chatgpt-4o + session data)
– every successful company will feel like a subculture. the product is just a portal in
– outbound are agents scraping, qualifying, and writing personalized intros 24/7
– customer support = 1 human backed by 5 lindy agents trained on every support ticket ever written
– micro-apps will outperform mega-tools. specific > general
– growth isn’t an afterthought. it’s built into the product (agent-invite loops, ai-powered referrals)
– if your product doesn't spark curiosity in 2 seconds, it’s invisible
– the best products of the next decade will be memes first, software second
– “launch” is outdated. leak it instead
– the new pricing model: $0 to play, $x to unlock identity
– you won’t sell software. you’ll sell outcomes, transformations, identity upgrades
– more people will leave big tech to build solo. not out of rebellion, but because their side hustles are more interesting
– the best homepages become a scene. your standard shadcn websites won’t hit the same
– default alive is low burn, small team, owned audience, high-leverage systems
– competitor research happens automatically. agents scrape, cluster, and surface positioning gaps
– your CRM isn’t stale. agents log calls, summarize deals, and write follow-ups before you hang up
– venture capital is optional
– customer success isn’t reactive. agents predict churn based on tone in support chats and usage
– we’ll see more “tiny empires”: one founder, one audience, and a constellation of tools they own
– bug reports are summarized, tagged, prioritized, and triaged by an agent before eng ever sees them
– IRL matters. founders become event planners
– most SaaS is overbuilt. the next wave wins by subtracting
– if your product can't be explained in a screenshot, it won't spread
– the creative director is the new power hire. taste is now a growth lever
– churned users get a custom winback campaign built by an agent based on why they left
– knowledge base builds itself from slack threads, loom links, and discord q&a (agents + gpt vision)
– product feedback loops are instant. users speak → agents summarize, prioritize, and mock ui changes
– most startups will die trying to be “all-in-one.” the winners do one weird thing stupidly well
– startup advice used to be: find a technical cofounder. now it’s: find a distribution edge
– your product isn’t finished when it works. it’s finished when people want to wear the hoodie
– the people who win distribution will own demand. the rest will rent it
if this felt like a glimpse into the future, it's because it is.
instead of bookmarking this, share it with a friend, and start building.
you don’t need permission to build like this.
you just need to start.
most people will ignore this.
but this is the new reality...
small teams, infinite leverage.
Happy building.
I'm rooting for you.
2025-04-06 10:06:22
RT 云中月
一个外行眼中的美元流动公式
在这个世界上，美元从来不仅仅是美国货币，它是一种全球结算工具、一种国家信用延伸，甚至是一种全球统治方式。
理解美元的力量，不能只盯着印钞机，而要明白它的循环结构。
我一直相信这个隐性却关键的经济公式：
现实中的世界美元总量 ≈
美国贸易逆差 + 政府财政赤字 + 美联储扩表
- 外国返美资产投资 - 全球美元流通池
这不是教科书中的美元公式，而是我这个外行所理解的现实世界中美元如何“创造—释放—回收”的动态等式。
一、美元是怎么“制造”出来的？
1. 贸易逆差：美国买世界，美元流出去
美国进口大于出口，把美元付给世界各国企业。这些美元是“真实流出”的，是制造“世界美元”的第一步。
2. 财政赤字：美国发债支出，美元进入市场
美国政府每年支出远超收入，要靠发债度日。这些债务的购买需要美元，美联储或市场释放基础货币支持它。
3. 美联储扩表：信用货币直接释放
美联储QE（量化宽松）时期通过购买资产释放美元，增加市场流动性。是美元“超常输出”的总阀门。
二、美元是怎么“销毁”的？
1. 全球投资美国资产：美债、美股等
外国赚来的美元常常会回头买美债、科技股、房地产，这部分美元虽然离开美国，但最终又变成了对美国信用的押注，回流本土。这时外国人拿到的是资产凭证而不是美元。
2. 全球流通需求：作为交易中介而沉淀
大量国家的企业在贸易、支付中保留美元，用作周转与信用保障。比如越南出口商收到美元后不会立刻换本币，而是继续采购原材料或还美元债。这个就是国际贸易必须的美元池。
三、美元是如何表达“霸权”的
美元的流动（生成和销毁）不是一个单向输出的水管，而是一个循环水系统。水从美国财政和消费端流出，在全球贸易、投资、储备中循环，再通过金融市场“回灌”到美国本土。
现在我们来假设：如果这个公式中的各项发生变化，全球美元体系会发生什么？
1. 降低财政赤字：美国少花钱了
少发国债 → 少释放美元 → 全球美元供给趋紧；依赖美元的国家面临“美元荒”，借贷成本上升；美债收益率下降，吸引力下降，资本外流风险上升。一句话：美元“水源头”变小，全球紧张。
2. 消除贸易逆差：美国不再大量进口
美元外流骤减，全球顺差国家少拿美元；出口国的美元收入下降，储备不足，财政承压；全球货币链条脱美元化意愿上升，国际币多元化加速。一句话：美元外溢量减少，霸权信用削弱。
3. 美联储缩表：主动抽水
美元基础货币减少，全球流动性紧张；高杠杆经济体（尤其发展中国家）被动收缩；新兴市场资本外逃，债务成本上升，可能爆雷。一句话：美元变贵，世界变苦。
4. 他国削减美元结算，大搞搞欧元，亚元，推动本币贸易
企业不再临时持有那么多美元，贸易去美元化；国际美元流通需求下降，“国际结算权”被蚕食；美元结算主导地位动摇，信用流通面缩小。一句话：交易不靠你结算，美元就少了一条腿。
5. 全球减少投资美国，不再多买美债、美股
美元不再回流，资金留在本地或投向其他币种资产；美国财政依赖外国资金被打断，美债发行承压；美元对外信心下降，可能触发利率或货币危机。一句话：你的钱我不要了，那你的债我也不信了。
美元作为国际货币的存在，玩的就是信用
美元不是因为“美国强”才强，而是因为它有足够多的信用出口口岸：贸易要它、投资认它、银行用它、央行收它。
一旦这些通道逐渐关闭，哪怕只是“每项减少一点”，整个美元霸权都会像是水坝上的裂缝，从水位下降开始，到结构动摇结束。
所以我们可以重新写出这样一个更新版的现实逻辑：
全球美元供给 = 美国放水的能力 - 世界吸纳的意愿
如果美国不放水，世界口渴；
如果世界不吸水，美国淹脚。
2025-04-04 14:58:25
RT Justin3go
这个开源服务竟然可以将任何公开github仓库转换为一个MCP服务，我不理解啊！
（只需将github(.)com替换为gitmcp(.)io）
🫱https://gitmcp.io/
