2025-08-15 23:38:40
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping industries, governments, and societies—but how do people around the world actually feel about that?
In this visualization, we show public attitudes towards artificial intelligence across 21 countries, based on a global AI survey of over 1,000 people in each country. Respondents were asked to rate their overall opinion on AI, ranging from “very positive” to “very negative”.
The data for this visualization comes from the Global Public Opinion on Artificial Intelligence (GPO-AI), published by the Schwartz Resiman Institute for Technology and Society.
Country | Very Positive |
Fairly Positive |
Neutral | Fairly Negative |
Very Negative |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
43 | 31 | 13 | 6 | 6 |
![]() |
29 | 46 | 14 | 7 | 4 |
![]() |
27 | 34 | 27 | 8 | 4 |
![]() |
26 | 39 | 22 | 8 | 5 |
![]() |
24 | 32 | 34 | 7 | 3 |
![]() |
20 | 51 | 16 | 9 | 3 |
![]() |
19 | 41 | 25 | 10 | 5 |
![]() |
18 | 48 | 30 | 2 | 1 |
![]() |
16 | 34 | 31 | 12 | 6 |
![]() |
16 | 36 | 36 | 9 | 4 |
![]() |
12 | 21 | 34 | 19 | 15 |
![]() |
11 | 21 | 35 | 20 | 13 |
![]() |
11 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 7 |
![]() |
11 | 32 | 46 | 7 | 3 |
![]() |
10 | 25 | 40 | 16 | 9 |
![]() |
10 | 35 | 34 | 16 | 6 |
![]() |
9 | 27 | 36 | 17 | 11 |
![]() |
9 | 30 | 39 | 15 | 7 |
![]() |
9 | 32 | 40 | 13 | 6 |
![]() |
8 | 33 | 44 | 11 | 4 |
![]() |
8 | 25 | 35 | 22 | 10 |
![]() |
7 | 28 | 34 | 19 | 11 |
India topped the global AI survey with 43% of respondents expressing a “very positive” opinion of AI. Kenya (29%) and Brazil (27%) followed closely behind.
These results suggest that populations in emerging economies are more enthusiastic about the potential benefits of AI—perhaps due to expectations for job creation, economic development, or improvements in public services.
In contrast, a majority in developed countries held neutral views. In Japan, 44% of people said they felt neutral about AI, followed by Germany (40%) and Poland (40%).
This more cautious stance could reflect greater exposure to discussions on AI ethics, job displacement, and regulation.
The U.S., France, and Australia reported the highest shares of negative sentiment.
For instance, 34% of U.S. respondents had either a “fairly” or “very negative” view of AI. Such skepticism might be tied to political divides, concerns about misinformation, or fears of job loss in white-collar industries.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Capital Expenditure by Hyperscalers on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2025-08-14 22:52:43
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The world produced over 92 million vehicles in 2024, with China, the U.S., and Japan leading the totals.
While these three countries accounted for 54% of all vehicles built, emerging markets like India, Mexico, and Brazil are also climbing the rankings.
In this visualization, we map global vehicle production by country, highlighting the industry’s hotspots.
The data for this visualization comes from OICA. The table below also includes year-over-year changes for each country.
Country | Total | % Change |
---|---|---|
![]() |
31,281,592 | 4% |
![]() |
10,562,188 | -12% |
![]() |
8,234,681 | -9% |
![]() |
6,014,691 | 3% |
![]() |
4,202,642 | 4% |
![]() |
4,127,252 | -3% |
![]() |
4,069,222 | -1% |
![]() |
2,549,595 | 10% |
![]() |
2,376,504 | -3% |
![]() |
1,468,997 | -20% |
![]() |
1,458,892 | 4% |
![]() |
1,365,296 | -7% |
![]() |
1,342,647 | -14% |
![]() |
1,196,664 | -14% |
![]() |
993,000 | -8% |
![]() |
982,665 | 35% |
![]() |
910,243 | -10% |
![]() |
905,233 | -1% |
![]() |
790,347 | 2% |
![]() |
599,755 | -5% |
![]() |
591,067 | -32% |
![]() |
560,102 | 9% |
![]() |
559,645 | 5% |
![]() |
555,346 | -9% |
![]() |
506,571 | -17% |
![]() |
437,045 | -14% |
![]() |
429,364 | 1% |
![]() |
332,546 | 5% |
![]() |
275,156 | -4% |
![]() |
240,366 | -28% |
![]() |
144,624 | -2% |
![]() |
71,785 | -37% |
![]() |
60,903 | 0% |
![]() |
22,384 | -26% |
Other | 2,285,328 | |
Total | 92,504,338 | -1% |
China produced over 31 million vehicles in 2024, which is more than the U.S. and Japan combined. This massive scale is underpinned by strong domestic demand, rapid electric vehicle adoption, and a growing export network.
The U.S. and Japan are the world’s next biggest automakers, though both saw a dip in production compared to 2023.
It’s interesting to note how production can also differ between countries. For example, the majority of Chinese production is passenger cars (27.5 million) rather than commercial vehicles (3.8 million).
The U.S. is the opposite, producing 9.1 million commercial vehicles and only 1.4 million passenger cars throughout 2024.
Emerging markets are cementing their status as major automotive manufacturing hubs.
Their growth is fueled by rising income levels, regional trade deals, and the relocation of supply chains from higher-cost regions.
For example, Mexico has become a major production base for brands like BMW, which inaugurated its San Luis Potosí plant in 2019 to produce the 3 Series, 2 Series Coupe, and M2.
Tesla is also planning a Gigafactory Mexico, which is scheduled to begin construction in 2026.
Russia posted the highest year-over-year production growth rate in 2024, at 35%. The departure of Western carmakers has created a production gap in the country, which is being filled by domestic and Chinese brands.
As of 2023, LADA is Russia’s most popular car brand with a 30.7% market share, followed by Chinese brands like Chery (11.2%), Haval (10.6%), and Geely (8.8%).
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out EV Market Share by Country on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2025-08-14 20:11:40
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Personal income levels across the U.S. vary widely, shaped by differences in industries, costs of living, and economic growth.
This map lists states by their per capita personal income, showing where residents, on average, earn the most.
The data for this visualization comes from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, compiled by StatsAmerica.
These figures include pre-tax earnings from: wages, insurance & government business & rental income, interest, and dividends, unadjusted for living costs.
It does not include capital gains from selling stock.
Washington, D.C. holds the highest per capita personal income in the nation at $108,233, boosted by a concentration of high-paying government, legal, and consulting jobs.
Rank | State | Code | Per Capita Personal Income (2024) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DC | DC | $108,233 |
2 | Massachusetts | MA | $93,927 |
3 | Connecticut | CT | $93,235 |
4 | Wyoming | WY | $85,945 |
5 | New York | NY | $85,733 |
6 | California | CA | $85,518 |
7 | New Jersey | NJ | $84,071 |
8 | Washington | WA | $83,938 |
9 | New Hampshire | NH | $82,878 |
10 | Colorado | CO | $82,705 |
11 | Maryland | MD | $78,538 |
12 | Virginia | VA | $77,093 |
13 | Alaska | AK | $75,247 |
14 | Minnesota | MN | $74,943 |
15 | Illinois | IL | $74,197 |
16 | South Dakota | SD | $73,959 |
17 | Nebraska | NE | $71,859 |
18 | Pennsylvania | PA | $71,148 |
19 | North Dakota | ND | $70,966 |
20 | Oregon | OR | $70,685 |
21 | Florida | FL | $70,390 |
22 | Vermont | VT | $70,086 |
23 | Rhode Island | RI | $69,936 |
24 | Hawaii | HI | $69,520 |
25 | Delaware | DE | $69,282 |
26 | Nevada | NV | $68,657 |
27 | Maine | ME | $68,129 |
28 | Kansas | KS | $68,038 |
29 | Texas | TX | $67,942 |
30 | Montana | MT | $67,615 |
31 | Wisconsin | WI | $67,586 |
32 | Utah | UT | $66,443 |
33 | Tennessee | TN | $64,908 |
34 | North Carolina | NC | $64,855 |
35 | Missouri | MO | $64,740 |
36 | Arizona | AZ | $64,456 |
37 | Ohio | OH | $64,225 |
38 | Indiana | IN | $63,802 |
39 | Iowa | IA | $63,573 |
40 | Michigan | MI | $63,221 |
41 | Oklahoma | OK | $62,661 |
42 | Georgia | GA | $62,393 |
43 | Idaho | ID | $61,836 |
44 | Louisiana | LA | $61,332 |
45 | South Carolina | SC | $59,995 |
46 | Arkansas | AR | $59,663 |
47 | New Mexico | NM | $57,652 |
48 | Kentucky | KY | $57,526 |
49 | Alabama | AL | $56,684 |
50 | West Virginia | WV | $55,138 |
51 | Mississippi | MS | $52,017 |
Massachusetts follows at $93,927, powered by its robust education, healthcare, and tech sectors.
Connecticut, with its strong finance and insurance industries, comes in third at $93,235.
All three leaders are at nearly twice the income last-ranked Mississippi ($52,017), reflecting the impact of specialized, high-skill industries on local income levels.
Meanwhile, New York ($85,733), New Jersey ($84,071), and New Hampshire ($82,878) keep the broader Northeast near the top of the distribution.
California ($85,518) and Washington ($83,938) both place in the top 10 states by income.
Their high incomes are linked to thriving technology and innovation economies, with major employers like Apple, Microsoft, and Google anchoring the regions.
These states also attract high-skilled migrants, further boosting wage levels.
The bottom of the ranking is dominated by Southern states, with Mississippi at $52,017 and West Virginia at $55,138.
Lower wages, coupled with economies centered on agriculture and lower-wage manufacturing, contribute to these figures.
These same states also have a higher rate of poverty, but also a lower cost of living.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: The Purchasing Power of $100 in Each U.S. State on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2025-08-14 02:51:28
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Today, global AI computing resources are clearly concentrated in the U.S. and China.
Together, the two countries host 50 of the world’s 132 AI accelerator-enabled cloud regions. Given rising demand for AI systems, several countries are ramping up investment in local AI infrastructure, much of this in partnership with Nvidia.
This graphic shows AI computing hubs by country, based on data from the University of Oxford.
Below, we show the number of AI accelerator-enabled cloud regions by country:
Country | Number of AI Accelerator-enabled Cloud Regions |
---|---|
![]() |
26 |
![]() |
24 |
![]() |
7 |
![]() |
6 |
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
5 |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
3 |
![]() |
3 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
1 |
Today, the U.S. and China are the only countries globally with AI accelerators—specialized chips like Nvidia GPUs—from domestic suppliers.
In fact, over 95% of the world’s AI accelerators are powered by U.S. chipmakers.
As a result “compute sovereignty” is highly uneven globally, with the vast majority of nations having no AI infrastructure at all. More recently, the European Commission slotted $23 billion for creating five AI gigafactories. Meanwhile, the UAE is investing $1.4 trillion in AI infrastructure to drive economic transformation.
Overall, Nvidia says that 20 countries so far are expressing interest in AI sovereignty initiatives, including France, Germany, and Indonesia.
To learn more about this topic from a revenue perspective, check out this graphic on how Nvidia makes its billions.
2025-08-14 01:02:02
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Much of the vast space of the U.S. is occupied by farmland, which produces many of the most demanded commodities. But which states have the most of their area used by farms?
The map uses the latest data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to show the share of each state’s land area used for farming.
From the nation’s agricultural core to coastal outliers, this table shows each state’s “farms’ share of state land area,” a comparable measure that helps explain where farming is most land-intensive.
State | Farms' Share of State's Land Area |
---|---|
Alabama | 26.5% |
Alaska | 0.2% |
Arizona | 34.4% |
Arkansas | 40.8% |
California | 23.8% |
Colorado | 44.2% |
Connecticut | 11.9% |
Delaware | 41.7% |
Florida | 28.3% |
Georgia | 26.9% |
Hawaii | 25.5% |
Idaho | 21.7% |
Illinois | 74% |
Indiana | 63.2% |
Iowa | 83.9% |
Kansas | 85.6% |
Kentucky | 49.1% |
Louisiana | 28.9% |
Maine | 6.1% |
Maryland | 32.2% |
Massachusetts | 9.4% |
Michigan | 26% |
Minnesota | 49.8% |
Mississippi | 34% |
Missouri | 61.1% |
Montana | 61.6% |
Nebraska | 89.5% |
Nevada | 8.4% |
New Hampshire | 7.3% |
New Jersey | 14.9% |
New Mexico | 50.1% |
New York | 21.6% |
North Carolina | 26% |
North Dakota | 87.2% |
Ohio | 51.6% |
Oklahoma | 74.9% |
Oregon | 24.9% |
Pennsylvania | 24.8% |
Rhode Island | 9.1% |
South Carolina | 23.9% |
South Dakota | 87.2% |
Tennessee | 40.5% |
Texas | 74.8% |
Utah | 20% |
Vermont | 20.3% |
Virginia | 28.9% |
Washington | 32.4% |
West Virginia | 22.8% |
Wisconsin | 39.8% |
Wyoming | 46.3% |
Together, U.S. farms account for roughly 39% of the country’s land area—about 876 million acres.
Nebraska ranks first with 89.5% of its land in farms. North Dakota and South Dakota follow closely at 87.2% each. Kansas (85.6%) and Iowa (83.9%) round out the top five, reflecting deep prairie soils and flat terrain that support large-scale row crops.
Oklahoma (74.9%), Texas (74.8%), and Illinois (74.0%) are also high, underscoring how the Great Plains and Midwest anchor U.S. agricultural land and industry.
Alaska sits at the bottom with just 0.2% of land in farms. Short growing seasons and limited arable land are key factors, even with long summer daylight.
New England and parts of the coastal Northeast are also low: Maine (6.1%), New Hampshire (7.3%), Rhode Island (9.1%), and Massachusetts (9.4%). Dense populations, forest cover, and competing land uses reduce the agricultural industry’s footprint in these states.
Agricultural land share reflects climate, soils, and topography. The prairie states combine fertile mollisol soils with broad, relatively flat landscapes—ideal for mechanized farming.
In the arid Southwest, irrigation enables significant farming but limits the share of land used: New Mexico is about 50.1% while Arizona is 34.4%.
In Alaska, farms face a narrow 90–120 day growing window despite long summer daylight, keeping farmland’s footprint tiny. Altogether, these regional constraints create the striking “belt” of high farm shares through the center of the country.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out the share of U.S. livestock that is factory farmed on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2025-08-13 22:47:44
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Does cutting government headcount make it work more effectively?
From firing inspectors-general, to mass layoffs in the Department of Education, the federal workforce is being scaled back. So far, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of 12 of these terminations, while scores of workers are leaving voluntarily.
This graphic shows Trump’s federal layoffs, based on data from CNN.
In the table below, we show more than 51,000 federal job cuts as of July 14, 2025:
Agency | Share of Agency Fired | Number of Employees Fired |
---|---|---|
US Agency for International Development | 100.0% | 10K |
Institute of Museum and Library Services | 100.0% | 75 |
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | 86.4% | 1.5K |
Agency for Global Media | 84.8% | 1.4K |
AmeriCorps | 84.4% | 650 |
HUD Community Planning and Development | 83.3% | 780 |
Small Business Administration | 41.5% | 2.7K |
Education | 33.3% | 1.4K |
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | 18.6% | 2.4K |
Food and Drug Administration | 16.7% | 5.3K |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | 12.7% | 1.6K |
Geological Survey | 10.0% | 1K |
State | 9.3% | 1.4K |
Forest Service | 8.8% | 3.5K |
General Services Administration | 8.6% | 1.6K |
Internal Revenue Service | 7.4% | 7.3K |
Energy | 5.8% | 1K |
National Institutes of Health | 5.7% | 1.2K |
Central Intelligence Agency | 5.5% | 1.2K |
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | 5.4% | 675 |
Bureau of the Fiscal Service | 5.1% | 169 |
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services | 4.6% | at least 300 |
National Park Service | 4.6% | 1K |
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency | 3.8% | more than 130 |
Bureau of Engraving and Printing | 2.5% | 48 |
Science and Technology Directorate | 2.3% | 10 |
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency | 2.0% | 73 |
Labor | 1.2% | 170 |
Federal Aviation Administration | 0.9% | 400 |
Defense | 0.8% | 5.4K |
Federal Emergency Management Agency | 0.8% | over 200 |
Mint | 0.5% | 8 |
Transportation Security Administration | 0.4% | 243 |
Citizenship and Immigration Services | 0.2% | under 50 |
So far, 34 agencies or sub-agencies have made job cuts either through layoffs or notices of termination.
As a result, Washington D.C. is home to the highest number of layoffs in the country in 2025, with six agencies seeing at least 80% of their workforce eliminated. Most notably, USAID’s closure resulted in about 10,000 layoffs, with 83% of its programs being shut down.
Over the past 20 years, the agency has prevented 91 million deaths in emerging and developing economies through humanitarian, health care, and nutrition funding initiatives.
Meanwhile, the Small Business Administration cut about 42% of its workforce, equal to approximately 2,700 employees. Even more staggeringly, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) cut 86.4% of its staff. The CFPB regulates financial markets, including banks, credit card companies and mortgage lenders.
For perspective, the federal headcount stood at about three million employees in early 2025, with 50% working in the sector for more than 10 years. Overall, the U.S. ranks 11th out of 80 countries by share of government workers per capita, based on 2023 figures.
To learn more about this topic from a revenue perspective, check out this graphic on how Nvidia makes its billions.