2026-09-29 01:07:00
Medical research can shape new treatments, attract scientific talent, and strengthen an academic medical centre’s global reputation. Yet the strongest overall hospital brands do not always lead on research reputation.
This graphic, in partnership with Brand Finance, ranks the top research hospitals by reputation in 2026 using data from Brand Finance’s Global Top 250 Hospitals report.
The diversity of nations at the top is immediately apparent as all of the top four entries are located in separate countries.
Here is a table that shows the top 10 research hospitals by reputation, their countries, and research scores.
| Rank | Academic Medical Centre | Country | Research Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charité |
Germany |
88.5 |
| 2 | The University of Tokyo Hospital |
Japan |
87.1 |
| 3 | Groote Schuur Hospital |
South Africa |
86.6 |
| 4 | AP-HP - Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière |
France |
85.2 |
| 5 | Kyoto University Hospital |
Japan |
83.5 |
| 6 | Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
United Kingdom |
83.0 |
| 7 | University Health Network |
Canada |
82.8 |
| 8 | Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
United Kingdom |
82.8 |
| 9 | Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre (Melbourne) |
Australia |
82.0 |
| 10 | LaCardio |
Colombia |
81.2 |
| 11 | Johns Hopkins Hospital |
U.S. |
81.0 |
| 12 | National University Health System |
Singapore |
80.9 |
| 13 | Tata Memorial Centre |
India |
80.6 |
| 14 | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron |
Spain |
80.6 |
| 15 | Singapore General Hospital (SGH) |
Singapore |
80.5 |
| 16 | Hospital Universitario Fundación Valle del Lili |
Colombia |
80.0 |
| 17 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute |
U.S. |
80.0 |
| 18 | Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou |
France |
79.8 |
| 19 | Tygerberg Hospital |
South Africa |
79.7 |
| 20 | All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi (AIIMS) |
India |
79.4 |
Germany’s Charité leads with a research score of 88.5, followed by The University of Tokyo Hospital at 87.1. South Africa’s Groote Schuur Hospital places third at 86.6.
The top 10 span eight countries across five regions. Japan and the UK each place two institutions, while six other countries contribute one apiece.
The U.S. has five hospitals in the overall Brand Strength Index top 10, but none appear in the research top 10. Johns Hopkins Hospital, the strongest hospital brand overall, ranks 11th for research with a score of 81.0.
That contrast shows how category-specific scores can produce a different hierarchy. Meanwhile, North America places 29 hospitals in the overall global top 100.
Research performance also matters beyond academic prestige. NIH programs focused on translational research emphasize moving discoveries toward improved patient care through collaboration among medical institutions.
Brand Finance’s research score reflects healthcare professionals’ perceptions of reputation, innovation, scientific breakthroughs, clinical translation, and talent attraction. It also considers contributions to medical research and recommendations for research collaboration.
The study surveyed 2,500 practicing healthcare professionals across 30 countries. Therefore, these scores measure perceived research strength rather than publication volume or citation counts alone.

See where U.S. hospital brands cluster in 2026, as Johns Hopkins leads and three regions dominate the map.

This map shows which countries place the most hospitals in Brand Finance’s 2026 Global Top 100 Hospitals rankings.

We visualize the top hospital brands of 2026 based on rankings from Brand Finance, who looked at various factors to determine brand strength.
2026-09-28 23:40:11
The U.S. labor market is projected to add nearly 5.9 million jobs between 2025 and 2035.
This graphic ranks 30 occupations by their projected increase in employment over the decade. The data for this visualization comes from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, using employment projections for 2025 to 2035.
The figures measure the net increase in employment for each occupation rather than total job openings, which can also include positions created when existing workers retire or change careers.
Home health and personal care aides stand far above every other occupation, with 847,300 new jobs projected by 2035. That represents about 14% of all net new jobs expected across the U.S. economy over the decade.
| Rank | Occupation | New jobs by 2035P | Median wage, 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Home & Personal Care Aides | 847K | $35,800 |
| 2 | Stockers & Order Fillers | 251K | $37,330 |
| 3 | Fast Food Workers | 223K | $31,200 |
| 4 | Registered Nurses | 195K | $97,550 |
| 5 | Operations Managers | 181K | $105,770 |
| 6 | Software Developers | 175K | $135,980 |
| 7 | Restaurant Cooks | 171K | $37,390 |
| 8 | Health Services Managers | 155K | $123,860 |
| 9 | Nurse Practitioners | 138K | $132,300 |
| 10 | Construction Laborers | 109K | $47,120 |
| 11 | Management Analysts | 109K | $101,860 |
| 12 | IT Managers | 108K | $175,140 |
| 13 | Medical Assistants | 108K | $45,690 |
| 14 | Mental Health Counselors | 98K | $59,350 |
| 15 | Data Scientists | 95K | $120,230 |
| 16 | Financial Managers | 85K | $166,570 |
| 17 | Heavy Truck Drivers | 84K | $58,640 |
| 18 | Industrial Mechanics | 80K | $64,520 |
| 19 | Accountants & Auditors | 79K | $83,680 |
| 20 | Electricians | 76K | $63,190 |
| 21 | Project Managers | 73K | $102,320 |
| 22 | Maintenance Workers | 69K | $49,590 |
| 23 | Light Truck Drivers | 68K | $44,860 |
| 24 | Food Service Supervisors | 67K | $44,080 |
| 25 | Market Research Analysts | 66K | $78,760 |
| 26 | Other Managers | 66K | $141,900 |
| 27 | HR Specialists | 60K | $75,940 |
| 28 | Landscaping Workers | 56K | $39,150 |
| 29 | Construction Managers | 55K | $114,990 |
| 30 | Janitors & Cleaners | 54K | $36,840 |
Demand is being fueled in part by America’s aging population and a shift toward providing long-term care in home and community settings. The Census Bureau projects that adults age 65 and older will outnumber children under 18 by 2029.
Healthcare occupations appear throughout the ranking, including registered nurses, medical assistants, nurse practitioners, and medical and health services managers.
Nurse practitioners are projected to grow 41% between 2025 and 2035, the fastest percentage increase among the occupations shown, while adding nearly 138,000 jobs.
Technology also remains a major source of higher-paying employment, with software developers projected to add about 175,000 jobs and data scientists another 95,000. Both occupations had median annual wages above $120,000 in 2025.
Some of the country’s biggest sources of new jobs are relatively low-paying service occupations.
Eleven of the 30 occupations shown have median annual wages below the overall U.S. median of $50,980, including home health and personal care aides, fast food workers, restaurant cooks, and light truck drivers.
At the other end of the spectrum, the ranking includes IT managers, financial managers, software developers, and nurse practitioners, all with median wages above $130,000.
Looking ahead, the skills needed in the labor market are also expected to shift.
According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, nearly 40% of skills required on the job are expected to change by 2030.
While demand for AI, big data, and cybersecurity skills is rising quickly, employers also continue to prioritize human capabilities such as analytical thinking, creative thinking, resilience, leadership, and collaboration.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Every U.S. State’s Most Common Job, 25 Years Apart on Voronoi.
2026-09-28 22:07:49
The world’s biggest companies generate enormous revenues, but the share that ultimately becomes profit varies widely.
This graphic ranks the world’s 30 largest companies by how much profit they generate for every $100 in revenue, based on Fortune Global 500 data. Profits are after taxes, extraordinary credits or charges, accounting changes, and noncontrolling interests, but before preferred dividends.
Revenue measures how much money flows through a company, but not how much ultimately reaches the bottom line. Across the world’s largest companies, Big Tech stands apart in how much of that revenue becomes profit.
| Rank | Name | Profit per $100 in Revenue (2026) | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia | $55.60 | $120B |
| 2 | Microsoft | $36.10 | $102B |
| 3 | Alphabet | $32.80 | $132B |
| 4 | Meta | $30.10 | $60B |
| 5 | Apple | $26.90 | $112B |
| 6 | Industrial & Commercial Bank of China | $24.30 | $51B |
| 7 | Saudi Aramco | $20.80 | $93B |
| 8 | JPMorgan Chase | $20.30 | $57B |
| 9 | Berkshire Hathaway | $18.00 | $67B |
| 10 | Samsung Electronics | $13.30 | $31B |
| 11 | Amazon | $10.80 | $78B |
| 12 | ExxonMobil Holdings | $8.70 | $29B |
| 13 | Toyota Motor | $7.60 | $26B |
| 14 | Shell | $6.50 | $18B |
| 15 | China National Petroleum | $5.30 | $21B |
| 16 | Walmart | $3.10 | $22B |
| 17 | Costco Wholesale | $2.90 | $8B |
| 18 | UnitedHealth Group | $2.70 | $12B |
| 19 | Hon Hai Precision Industry | $2.30 | $6B |
| 20 | Volkswagen | $2.30 | $8B |
| 21 | Cigna Group | $2.20 | $6B |
| 22 | State Grid | $2.00 | $11B |
| 23 | Sinopec Group | $1.40 | $5B |
| 24 | McKesson | $1.20 | $5B |
| 25 | Trafigura Group | $1.10 | $3B |
| 26 | China State Construction Engineering | $1.10 | $3B |
| 27 | Cardinal Health | $0.70 | $2B |
| 28 | Cencora | $0.50 | $2B |
| 29 | CVS Health | $0.40 | $2B |
| 30 | Glencore | $0.10 | $0.4B |
Profits rounded to the nearest 10 cents.
The gap is striking even among corporate giants. Microsoft generates $36.10 in profit for every $100 in revenue, compared with roughly $3 for Walmart and Costco. Enormous revenue does not necessarily translate into an equally large profit margin.
Much of the difference comes down to business models. Software and digital platforms can serve additional customers at relatively low incremental cost, while retailers, manufacturers, and energy companies must continually pay for inventory, labor, raw materials, logistics, or production.
The margins shown above reflect today’s business models, but AI is making many of those models more capital-intensive. Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into AI infrastructure. Hyperscaler capital spending is on track to reach $785 billion in 2026 and rise to nearly $1 trillion in 2027.
Nvidia is a major beneficiary of this investment. As a dominant supplier of AI chips, it sits at the center of the infrastructure buildout, while its CUDA software ecosystem can make switching to rival chips more difficult for developers.
On the flipside, the scale of AI investment is raising capital costs across Big Tech. As infrastructure spending climbs, those costs could begin to reshape the margins that currently put many tech companies near the top of this ranking.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s largest companies outside the U.S.
2026-09-28 20:04:34
This map shows the top-rated employer in every U.S. state in 2026, offering a snapshot of which large organizations earn the strongest marks from workers across the country.
The ranking is based on a Forbes survey of more than 245,000 employees. It covers organizations with at least 500 employees and considers pay, benefits, career growth, management, flexibility, and employee recommendations.
Microsoft ranks first in nine states and Google in seven, meaning the two tech giants collectively lead nearly one-third of the country. Overall, tech companies take the top spot in 19 states.
| State | Company | Sector |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | NASA | Government |
| Alaska | Providence St. Joseph Health | Healthcare |
| Arizona | Apple | Tech |
| Arkansas | Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield | Finance |
| California | Trader Joe's | Consumer |
| Colorado | Microsoft | Tech |
| Connecticut | ASML Holding | Tech |
| Delaware | Mountaire | Consumer |
| District of Columbia | Tech | |
| Florida | Charles Schwab | Finance |
| Georgia | Microsoft | Tech |
| Hawaii | United Airlines | Industrial |
| Idaho | WinCo Foods | Consumer |
| Illinois | Tech | |
| Indiana | Tech | |
| Iowa | Hormel Foods | Consumer |
| Kansas | Pfizer | Healthcare |
| Kentucky | Toyota North America | Industrial |
| Louisiana | Lockheed Martin | Industrial |
| Maine | IDEXX Laboratories | Healthcare |
| Maryland | Microsoft | Tech |
| Massachusetts | Tech | |
| Michigan | Delta Air Lines | Industrial |
| Minnesota | Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota | Finance |
| Mississippi | University of Mississippi Medical Center | Healthcare |
| Missouri | Fabick Cat | Industrial |
| Montana | First Interstate Bank | Finance |
| Nebraska | Bryan Health | Healthcare |
| Nevada | JPMorganChase | Finance |
| New Hampshire | Demoulas Super Markets | Consumer |
| New Jersey | Tech | |
| New Mexico | Home Depot | Consumer |
| New York | Microsoft | Tech |
| North Carolina | Microsoft | Tech |
| North Dakota | Essentia Health | Healthcare |
| Ohio | Microsoft | Tech |
| Oklahoma | IBM | Tech |
| Oregon | Microsoft | Tech |
| Pennsylvania | Lockheed Martin | Industrial |
| Rhode Island | Fidelity Investments | Finance |
| South Carolina | Honeywell Technologies | Industrial |
| South Dakota | U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Government |
| Tennessee | Tech | |
| Texas | Microsoft | Tech |
| Utah | Delta Air Lines | Industrial |
| Vermont | M&T Bank | Finance |
| Virginia | Microsoft | Tech |
| Washington | Tech | |
| West Virginia | Sheetz | Consumer |
| Wisconsin | Kimberly-Clark | Consumer |
| Wyoming | State of Wyoming | Government |
Outside of tech, the results span a wide range of employers.
NASA leads in Alabama, Lockheed Martin in Louisiana, Toyota in Kentucky, and Trader Joe’s in California. Healthcare, finance, government, industrial, and consumer organizations also claim top spots across the country.
Pay is only one part of how Americans evaluate their workplaces. Benefits, career development, management, flexibility, and job security can also shape overall satisfaction.
In 2026, overall U.S. job satisfaction reached 68.9%, the highest level in 39 years and the 16th consecutive annual increase. That marks a sharp recovery from 2010, when satisfaction fell to 42.6% amid a weak post-recession labor market.
Income remains a major dividing line. Satisfaction ranged from 45.3% among workers in households earning under $25,000 to 76% among those earning $150,000 or more.
At the same time, the labor market remains uncertain, which may make job security more important to workers. Nearly four in 10 workers also said advanced AI improved their job satisfaction, adding another dimension to the changing workplace landscape.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the 30 highest-paying jobs in America.
2026-09-28 01:37:06
From semiconductors and displays to smartphones and computers, much of the hardware powering the global economy is produced in a relatively small group of countries.
This visualization ranks countries by their share of global digital hardware capacity in 2024–25. The data for this graphic comes from Ember analysis, drawing on data from SEMI, DSCC, Prismark, Counterpoint Research, TrendForce, IEA, BNEF, and GWEC.
Digital hardware includes semiconductor fabrication, displays, printed circuit boards, smartphones, computers, and related electronics manufacturing capacity.
China’s lead is enormous: its share of global digital hardware capacity is nearly six times that of second-ranked Taiwan.
In fact, China has more capacity than every other country in the dataset combined.
| Rank | Country | Share of digital hardware capacity, 2024–25 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
China |
58.8% |
| 2 |
Taiwan |
10.2% |
| 3 |
South Korea |
6.7% |
| 4 |
Japan |
4.8% |
| 5 |
India |
3.8% |
| 6 |
Vietnam |
3.6% |
| 7 |
United States |
2.9% |
| 8 |
Thailand |
1.3% |
| 9 |
Mexico |
1.2% |
| 10 |
Germany |
0.7% |
| 10 |
Singapore |
0.7% |
| 12 |
Malaysia |
0.6% |
| 13 |
Brazil |
0.4% |
| 14 |
Israel |
0.3% |
| 14 |
Indonesia |
0.3% |
| 15 |
Ireland |
0.2% |
| 15 |
Czechia |
0.2% |
| 15 |
Austria |
0.2% |
| 15 |
France |
0.2% |
| 15 |
Italy |
0.2% |
| 15 |
Türkiye |
0.2% |
| 22 |
Philippines |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Canada |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Bangladesh |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Pakistan |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Hungary |
0.1% |
| 22 |
United Kingdom |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Netherlands |
0.1% |
| 22 |
Egypt |
0.1% |
| -- |
Rest of World |
1.7% |
China’s position reflects its broad manufacturing base across finished electronics, displays, printed circuit boards, and other components.
Large-scale production networks also connect factories with dense clusters of suppliers, helping make the country a central hub for global hardware production.
China is also seeking to reinforce its electronics leadership through a new five-year plan focused on semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and other strategic technologies. The plan prioritizes advances across the integrated-circuit supply chain, including chips, as Beijing seeks to reduce reliance on Western technology.
The country targets more than 30 trillion yuan (about $4.5 trillion) in operating revenue from related industries by 2030.
Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan add another 21.7% of global capacity beyond China’s share.
Each market plays a distinct role in the electronics ecosystem, with major companies including TSMC, Foxconn, Samsung, BOE, and Sony operating across the region.
Taiwan is particularly important in semiconductor fabrication and electronics assembly, while South Korea has substantial chip and display capacity.
Japan remains an important producer of electronics, components, and technologies that support the wider hardware supply chain.
Beyond the top four countries, electronics manufacturing capacity drops sharply.
India ranks fifth with a 3.8% share, narrowly ahead of Vietnam at 3.6%.
The U.S. follows at 2.9%. While the country remains a major force in semiconductor design and innovation, its share of physical digital hardware capacity is comparatively small.
Thailand and Mexico are the only other countries above 1%, at 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively.
The ranking highlights the gap between where the world’s biggest technology companies are headquartered and where their physical hardware is actually produced. While the U.S. is home to many leading technology and chip-design firms, the manufacturing capacity behind the global electronics supply chain remains heavily concentrated in Asia.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Big Tech AI Spending Over Time on Voronoi.
2026-09-27 23:19:45

American households are worth a combined $185.7 trillion, and more than half of that belongs to a single generation.
This graphic compares each generation’s share of U.S. households with its share of household net worth as of Q2 2026, using data from the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts.
Net worth is assets such as homes, stocks, and pensions minus debts like mortgages and credit cards. The Fed assigns each household to a generation based on the birth year of its reference person, typically the head of household, and counts everyone born in 1981 or later as a Millennial, so Gen Z is included in that group.
Decades of accumulating stocks, homes, and pension savings have left Baby Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, with the largest share of U.S. household wealth.
Generation X is the only generation whose share of wealth closely matches its share of households, at 26% for each, with $47.7 trillion in net worth.
The table below shows each generation’s share of U.S. households and household net worth as of Q2 2026:
| Generation | Birth Years | U.S. Household Wealth by Generation, Q2 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share of Households (%) | Share of Net Worth (%) | Net Worth ($T) | ||
| Silent Generation and older |
Before 1946 | 6.6 | 10.7 | 19.78 |
| Baby Boomers | 1946–1964 | 30.4 | 52.5 | 97.40 |
| Generation X | 1965–1980 | 25.8 | 25.7 | 47.66 |
| Millennials (incl. Gen Z) |
1981 or later | 37.2 | 11.2 | 20.80 |
| All U.S. households | -- | 100.0 | 100.0 | 185.65 |
The Silent Generation and older now head just 7% of households, but those households hold 11% of U.S. household wealth, averaging about $2.2 million in net worth each.
Stock ownership helps set Boomers’ wealth apart. They hold $35.2 trillion in stocks and mutual funds, or 55% of the household total. Their net worth rose by $7.9 trillion in Q2 2026 alone, with $5.5 trillion of that increase coming from equities. That quarterly equity gain alone was equal to more than a quarter of all Millennial and Gen Z wealth.
Millennials and Gen Z have grown from 4.9% of U.S. household net worth in Q2 2020 to 11.2% today, as their wealth nearly quadrupled from $5.3 trillion to $20.8 trillion.
Even so, Boomer net worth rose by $38.2 trillion over the same six years, compared with $15.5 trillion for Millennials and Gen Z, who make up the largest generational group in America. A smaller percentage gain on a much larger base can still add more dollars.
The table below shows each generation’s share of U.S. household net worth in the second quarter of every sixth year since 1990:
| Generation | Share of U.S. Household Net Worth by Year (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1996 | 2002 | 2008 | 2014 | 2020 | 2026 | |
| Silent Generation and older | 79.7 | 67.7 | 52.3 | 39.5 | 27.3 | 15.9 | 10.7 |
| Baby Boomers | 19.8 | 30.1 | 42.2 | 51.6 | 55.5 | 54.3 | 52.5 |
| Generation X | 0.5 | 2.2 | 5.5 | 8.6 | 15.7 | 24.9 | 25.7 |
| Millennials (incl. Gen Z) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 11.2 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
The Silent Generation held 80% of household wealth in 1990 and holds 11% today. The Boomer share peaked at 55.5% in 2014 and has slipped only three percentage points since, even as Boomers’ share of households fell from 36% to 30%.
Millennial balance sheets also look very different. Real estate makes up 38% of their assets, compared with 20% for Boomers, and they owe $8.6 trillion, or 43% of all household debt. That is more than Boomers and the Silent Generation owe combined, and equal to 29% of Millennial assets versus 4% for Boomers.
The generational wealth picture will continue to change as Boomers age and assets are transferred to younger generations. How quickly that reshapes the chart will depend not only on inheritances, but also on asset prices, debt, homeownership, and how wealth is distributed within each generation.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Wealth by Generation in the United States on Voronoi.